|
Post by Johawn on Jul 10, 2010 9:53:53 GMT -5
I did It's my cross to bear But you said you wouldn't get points for winning titles before this era. D'you mean after this goes into effect (if it does), or d'you mean since the reopening last year?
|
|
|
Post by Tempest on Jul 10, 2010 10:16:42 GMT -5
Since the relaunch. Sorry if I wasn't clear about that.
Basically guys like me who are *ahem* Grand Slam Champions and won a bunch of titles in the old days are sh*t outta luck. (Granted, its just kinda like Flair or Bret Hart running around, not QUITE in their prime anymore.)
|
|
|
Post by Danger Liam on Jul 10, 2010 11:43:10 GMT -5
Think we could also incorporate intelligence?
Also I'd like to put myself forward in terms of coming up with clever ways to describe each attribute, for example a 1 for personality means sits on his own in a corner at parties and so on and so forth?
|
|
|
Post by Tempest on Jul 10, 2010 12:01:29 GMT -5
Hmmm. Not a bad idea, adding intelligence. AND I agree on the stat specific descriptions. The one I came up was for just to get a general understanding of the concept.
|
|
Dan
Midcarder
Wonder No More
Posts: 368
|
Post by Dan on Jul 10, 2010 18:55:39 GMT -5
Sounds alright with me, although maybe the TV title reigns shouldn't count, eh? It was defended every week
|
|
|
Post by Danger Liam on Jul 10, 2010 19:09:26 GMT -5
Hmmm. Not a bad idea, adding intelligence. AND I agree on the stat specific descriptions. The one I came up was for just to get a general understanding of the concept. Here's what I got so far then I'll keep adding to them as I think of them, and It'd be cool if people want to suggest anything to add Personality: 1 - Sat in the corner on his own at a party 2 - Okay seriously who invited the weird kid 3 - I only need the one friend 4 - 5 - Your comfortable with yourself but don't make a show of it 6 - 7 - 8 - Sometimes you wanna go where everybody knows your name! 9 - The crowd hang on your every word 10 - Could make a room full of monks crack a smile Agility: 1 - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Strength: 1 - Has trouble picking himself out of bed 2 3 4 5 - Can lift his own body weight 6 7 8 9 10 - Immovable Force is nothing to me Speed: 1 - I choose you SNORLAX! 2 - As fast as a pensioner with a dodgy hip 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 - As fast as a South African of questionable gender 10 - FLASH! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh Durability: 1 - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - The Duracell Bunny Intelligence: 1 - Can't even tie his own shoes 2 3 4 5 - Has a High School Diploma 6 7 8 9 10 - Turned down Mensa to be a pro wrestler Technical Skill: 1 - Oh no it's the dreaded top wrist lock I may as well tap now 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 - Any and Everything is reservable
|
|
|
Post by Tempest on Jul 10, 2010 19:49:31 GMT -5
Sounds alright with me, although maybe the TV title reigns shouldn't count, eh? It was defended every week LOL. Good point.
|
|
Dan
Midcarder
Wonder No More
Posts: 368
|
Post by Dan on Jul 12, 2010 13:23:34 GMT -5
Must say, I like how I'm an example So, if we go by Hazard right now... it would be. Personality: 6/7 (There's one coming out) Agility: 9 Strength: 4 Speed: 10 Durability: 7 Technical Skill: 7 This was actually kind of easy for me... Personality: 1 Agility: 5 Strength: 10 Speed: 5 Durability: 10 Technical Skill: 9
|
|
|
Post by Tempest on Jul 12, 2010 14:03:12 GMT -5
Hmmm.
So, you're saying he's as strong as the Big Show? And personality-wise he's not even slightly appealing? Why would anyone watch him wrestle? You can have a high personality score and not be a people person...just look at Batman. He's charismatic as hell, but not likeable.
Not vetoing your Stats, just making an observation.
|
|
Dan
Midcarder
Wonder No More
Posts: 368
|
Post by Dan on Jul 12, 2010 14:24:08 GMT -5
Hmmm. So, you're saying he's as strong as the Big Show? And personality-wise he's not even slightly appealing? Why would anyone watch him wrestle? You can have a high personality score and not be a people person...just look at Batman. He's charismatic as hell, but not likeable. Not vetoing your Stats, just making an observation. Wasn't Kane like that for 4 years or so? Absolutely no personality but strong as an ox and was dominating the WWE? People watched him wrestle because of his power in the ring and his mysterious appeal. Same with Dean Malenko, not so much in the strength department but he had almost no "personality" in the ring but he was exciting to watch because everything he did with the cruiserweights was lightning-fast and was fun to watch. Not to start an argument, but possibly we could try to refine what these stats refer to. Well to be honest with you, I thought this would be proportional to size and such, strengthwise... I have no reason to have personality for this character, yet at least. He doesn't appeal to the people at all nor has he used a mic yet. I guess I could modify it a bit, but really it'd be a waste sinking points into personality. Personality: 3 Agility: 5 Strength: 8 Speed: 5 Durability: 10 Technical Skill: 9 Is that any better? Really, that's the only change I could see making. If we had another catagory, like the intelligence with the 46 points, then I could see making it a little more balanced, as such: Personality: 4 Agility: 6 Strength: 8 Speed: 4 Durability: 10 Intelligence: 7 Technical Skill: 7 This way he has personality within the confines of the ring, but beyond that no mic skills or appealing nature. Well this isn't permanent so you couldn't veto it yet anyways
|
|